AnyBook4Less.com	Find the Best Price on the Web Order from a Major Online Bookstore
Home  |  Store List  |  FAQ  |  Contact Us  |
Ultimate Book Price Comparison Engine Save Your Time And Money Keyword AuthorISBN

Title: Who Killed Stephanie Crowe: Anatomy of a Murder Investigation by Paul E., Ph. D. Tracy ISBN: 0-9741342-0-1 Publisher: True Crime Pub Llc Pub. Date: 01 June, 2003 Format: Paperback List Price(USD): $15.95

Your Country USA Canada United Kingdom Australia Austria Belgium France Germany Italy Netherlands Switzerland Currency AutoUSD CAD GBP EUR AUD CHF Delivery Only cheapest delivery All delivery options Include Used Books Are you a club member of: Barnes and Noble Books A Million Chapters.Indigo.ca

Average Customer Rating: 1 (1 review)

Rating: 1
Summary: Stop with this garbage!
Comment: It has been several years since the January 20, 1998 murder of Stephanie Crowe in Escondido, California and people are still treating it like a murder "mystery", even though Richard Tuite is presently on trial. Let me tell you something. I have been following this case on the Internet and on CourtTV almost from the very beginning. I have studied just about everything there is to know about the art of police interrogation techniques. I am also a man of science. And I can tell you without hesitation, that there is no forensic possibility that those three boys (Michael Crowe, Joshua Treadway, and Aaron Houser) were involved in this murder. I reach my conclusion for the following reasons:
1) There was no blood on any of their clothes - It is forensically impossible not to get blood spatter on your clothes after stabbing somebody (not that I would know from experience). And even if you buy into the idea that those three boys cleaned up their blood-soaked clothes, there are sophisticated forensic tests that can at least determine if blood has been on an article of clothing even if it cannot be tested. No such evidence has come about. Therefore, we can take it with a grain of salt that these three boys were not near Stephanie when she was stabbed.
2) The implausibility of the confessions - Michael never implicated Joshua or Aaron, but rather claimed that he killed Stephanie during a blackout (which was raised by the detectives). Joshua said that the murder took place well after midnight, even though the medical examiner concluded that her death had occurred no later than midnight. Joshua also said that he walked several miles from his house to Aaron's house and then to Michael's house and back in the middle of the night. That's an awful lot of walking for somebody who is not even an athlete. And then Joshua says he woke up around 7 a.m. and went to school and aced a final exam. I don't think so, people don't murder other people and then go to school as if nothing ever happened. Aaron said that he would have slashed Stephanie's throat and stabbed her in the chest even though the wounds on Stephanie's body were on her back and no neck wound was found.
3) The "so called" murder weapon - The Best Defense, claimed to be the murder weapon used by the three boys didn't have a long enough blade to make some of the deep cuts on Stephanie's body. That means that a longer knife had to have been used. Furthermore, what evidence did the police have to prove not only that the Best Defense knife was the murder weapon, but also whether or not it was taken from Aaron Houser's room by Joshua as he said during the beginning of his interrogation? How can they prove that Joshua was lying about that part?
4) The alibis of the three boys - Joshua and Aaron's family both acknowledged that it would very difficult for their sons to just slip out of the house undetected and then manage to creep back in without waking them up. Trust me...nobody is that sleepy not to hear a family member walking in late at night.
5) The DNA evidence against Tuite - There is no question that the blood of Stephanie Crowe, and only Stephanie Crowe, was found on Richard Tuite's clothing and that it was not smeared. Thus, it had to have gotten on his clothing by force, such as what happens when you stab somebody.
Even if you buy into the theory that Richard Tuite is to mentally unstable to commit a crime, how do you explain his prior crimes and the fact that he had spent years living as a transient. I'm sure he must have had his lucid moments.
Well, that pretty much sums it up. If you want to read a "science"fiction novel, you should check out this book. However, if you are like me and want to know the truth, I highly recommend the movie "The Interrogation of Michael Crowe".