Order from a Major Online Bookstore
Ultimate Book Price Comparison Engine
Save Your Time And Money
| AnyBook4Less.com | Order from a Major Online Bookstore |
|
| Home | Store List | FAQ | Contact Us | | ||
| Ultimate Book Price Comparison Engine Save Your Time And Money |
||
 |
Title: War on Iraq: What Team Bush Doesn't Want You to Know by William Rivers Pitt, Scott Ritter ISBN: 1-893956-38-5 Publisher: Context Books Pub. Date: 25 September, 2002 Format: Paperback Volumes: 1 List Price(USD): $8.95 |
Average Customer Rating: 3.37 (82 reviews)
Rating: 1
Summary: Yeeeaaahhh, Here Comes The Liar...Awwwwwww Yeeeaaahhh!!!!!!!
Comment: Books like this, which are more reasons to reinitiate book burning, are obscene. Scott Ritter is a dirty rotten liar----though this is a cliché----it's provable when you look at his notorious history. A few years ago he did all but condemn Iraq and Hussein of being 100% damned in having such a nuclear program with another book that he authored-------and now he ineptly tries to conceal this double-standard turnaround of his by "writing" a "book" so conflicting, just a couple of years later. Because of this clash of schools of thought, Ritter is obviously guilty for trying to withdraw strong convictions that he already asserted earlier, when he had more licit and firsthand access to knowledge concerning WMD.
Another distressingly disturbing side effect of profane literature like this, which is glaringly and only targeted at the rabid conspiracy theory crowd, is it lewdly encourages every incoherent extremist to stumble out of the woodwork. This is where they would normally be ostracized to discuss such insubstantially outrageous thoughts, along with other raging liberals of their ilk, namely out-of-work actors, struggling musicians, and publishers of conspiracy theory newsletters to the harsh underground. What really turns my stomach unhealthily is how the anti-government, anti-globalization, and anti-capitalization wackos verminously leap to their ferociously radical conclusions based on what's really the worst, lowest, most unverifiable opinion of some isolated person with no authority to make judgments based on his ghoulishly limited exposure to the subject at hand, because for years, he hasn't been privy to the intelligence.
Take the Swede who immediately preceded my review, for instance. Instead of discussing the acerbically many holes of the book which don't hold water, he fiercely dilapidates his comments to the present Iraq situation, which, since they have nothing to do with the reason of his review, is just another scapegoat excuse to further the illogical fanatics' agendas. Look at how he admits to the inconvenient FACT that this sensationalism in this children's book is solely based on anti-American, anti-government, direct leaping fabrications from 2 people. Does this stop the reviewer from unjustly and angrily conniving with the authors and himself outrightly dictating that "Iraq has no WMD"? Miserably, the reviewer has as deathly little restraint in libeling facts as do the perpetrators of this dirty publication. Moreover, the link between Hussein and Al-Qaeda's been confirmed (contrary to the willfully murderous forgeries of some people) in N Iraq, even though it's Kurdish controlled, because of ties of Ansar al-Islam (yet another terror group) to Al-Qaeda, through the planting of an agent there by the now-terminated Iraqi intelligence operatives. Add to this the ruthless funding of Hussein-Iraq towards Palestinian terrorist groups to mercilessly try to disrupt initiations of peace from the ever-willing and much more reasonable Israeli side, and the fact that US officials affirm that a captured, former high-ranking Iraqi diplomat admitted already to either himself or Hussein meeting face-to-face with Bin Laden in the mid-90s, and you've got a relentless impertinence and diabolicalness from past reviewers who're willfully polluting the true facts to conceal America's consistently impeccable intelligence, which has of late been the victim of slander and nothing material.
Moreover, what's even incrementally further outraging is the Swede's furiously disdainful intolerance of "if you don't believe America was in it for the oil, you're naive and gullible". He dishonestly refuses to mention Iraq's horribly poor oil quality, the fact that only 5% of America's oil comes from there, and the continuous fact that the only relationship America has with Iraqi oil is restarting it to pay for reconstruction and Iraqi civil servants' salaries, which have ALL been deliberately unrighteously covered up by the additionally wrathful Swede reviewer.
As for the WMD, not nearly enough time's been allowed to, rationally, find them in a time corresponding to Iraq's weighty size. Confound that with the burden that, of maybe 1000 or more target sites, a coarsely ineffective minority of maybe upwards of 200 to 300 have been examined at this time. Another deathblow to the shamelessly defiant, past 2 reviewers is the fact that when Colin Powell----at the UN----asserted to having proof about locations of the WMD labs, it was the chronically inefficient, anti-war, anarchistic left that arduously stalled the start of the war----allowing the Iraqis to hide them even more deviously. It's self-explanatory that, had the obstinate monstrosity of people in 3rd world or, countries which are increasingly threatened by American power due to their own deteriorating economic strength and status, not rebelled so infernally long to keep their work contracts with the Iraqis and falsify forged Arab delusions about mistrusting America's motives----we'd have found those craftily disguised factories promptly. These cornering impediments in hazardously extremist liberals' thinking are precisely what reduce their repetitively intolerant attacks of absolutely oppressing that "there are no WMD", to that of a scornful laughingstock. Also remember, anti-Bush mujahedeen like the Swede and the reviewer from Connecticut, that the UN who, because of their dependence on American money to continue existing, was one of the guiltiest arch-fiends of progress and international security, even themselves acknowledged in inordinately many reports from 1990 to 2002 that Iraq had nuclear and biochemical weapons, harmfully further weakening your shabby claims.
I'll close by addressing France, one member of the axis of weasels. For France, INSEE forecasted a catastrophically enormous rise in French unemployment to 9.6% by year's end, when ours is likely bottoming at 6.4%. As a matter of fact, it's gotten so gloomy in France that their government is resorting to "helped employment", where the government themselves pay to create jobs in their doomed "economy". Additionally, France's GDP is warning to be crushed even lower to an unquestionably terrifying .8% of illegitimate "growth". By comparison, ours is forecasted by some economists to ascend to 3.5% by year's end, although the present expectation of 1.4% is enough to best France already. I know this is a tad gratuitous, but I felt I had to write it, for posterity's sake!!!!
Rating: 1
Summary: To all the liberals here: FUKK YOU and may you burn in hell
Comment: A reader from Portland Or. Is THE DUMBASS of Cretinism
Everyone, look at this hopeless retard from Portland Or.. He actually has the audacious gall, like all the liberal psychopathic menaces to society do, of slandering the previous reviewer with dishonest claims of being "grammatically challenged"--yet this mentally retarded MIDGET committed the very epitome of grammatically flawed ignorance in the same sentence he slurred someone else. If you, reading this, are yourself grammatically idiotic and unschooled, let me educate you. That terminal dumbass from Portland errantly included a hyphen in between grammatically challenged--which is a NO-NO! You see, the rules say that one does NOT need a hyphen in between an adverb and the adjective it's modifying, because the word being modified is already CLEAR! Geez, liberals like that dumbassed retard out of Portland are also guilty of utter stupidity.
Oh, wait a second; since this is a "political" book, I might as well get my two cents in, right after I corrected that mental midget retard from Portland Or.. Well, that son of a bittch from Portland is also irreparably insane or just shamelessly dishonest, because America just found mustard gas AND sarin gas LAST WEEK, you infernally undereducated liberal nutcases who believe otherwise. A$$holes like all the liberals who've been awarding five stars to this garbage book, like the illiterately stupid mental midget from Portland, are doing the work of Al-Qaeda and they are demoralizing the troops who are doing the serious fighting by libeling the purity of their mission. They are also doing a favor for Osama Bin Laden by emboldening terrorists like him to misbelieve that America isn't united in wartime--which clearly the liberal devils like that mental midget charlatan from Portland are jealously doing all they can towards.
All the liberals who've written positive reviews for this contraband book are psychologically ill and NEED mental exams, because they're ruining the fabric of America with their treasonous backstabbing and hatred for war and the military!!!!!!!!!
Rating: 5
Summary: Proving Bush's incompetance retroactively
Comment: This book presents the most coherent, grounded, and chemically balanced viewpoint on the issue of WMD's in Iraq, quite unlike the previous reviewer. As any true expert in weapons of mass destruction would know (assuming they had passed the third grade), an incorrectly placed hyphen would be an example of bad punctuation, not grammar. But this is beyond the intelligence, or mental stability, of the average Neocon. If they were on their meds, they would realize that in this book, Ritter explains that Iraq had complied with UNSC res 687 to a 95% level of disarmament. While 5% remained unaccounted for, this simply did not rise to the necessity of war, nor did it constitute a threat to the US; therefore there was no practical justification for war.
As Ritter reveals, most of the remaining weapons, such as the two recently found, were hopelessly past their shelf lives, as they were manufactured prior to Gulf War I. Since Iraq's biochem stocks had shelf lives of no more than 3-5 years, these rusting relics were little more than inert museum pieces. Hardly representative of a supposed stockpile containing hundreds of tons of lethal gasses, they are a sad excuse for 800+ Americans to die. The most compelling validation of Ritter and this book has come from Bush's own point man in Iraq, David Kay, who has unequivically stated that in fact Iraq had no current stockpiles or active programs, and had not since the end of Gulf War I.
The screaming from those who have objected to this book stems from their guilt that the blood of American troops has been spilt in vain, and they are to blame. While this book could have avoided the tragedy, the treasonously naive hawks instead chose to be duped by Iran's intelligence service. Unwittingly doing the bidding of an axis of evil only shows them to be weak, paranoid, and stupid. Now we know they are also illiterate.
Thank you for visiting www.AnyBook4Less.com and enjoy your savings!
Copyright� 2001-2021 Send your comments
