AnyBook4Less.com | Order from a Major Online Bookstore |
![]() |
Home |  Store List |  FAQ |  Contact Us |   | ||
Ultimate Book Price Comparison Engine Save Your Time And Money |
![]() |
Title: Atheism, Morality, and Meaning (Prometheus Lecture Series) by Michael Martin ISBN: 1-57392-987-5 Publisher: Prometheus Books Pub. Date: October, 2002 Format: Paperback Volumes: 1 List Price(USD): $21.00 |
Average Customer Rating: 3.67 (3 reviews)
Rating: 4
Summary: Welcome addition to literature on religion & morality
Comment: Most of the recent literature on the relationship between religion and morality is written by theists. It is rare to find anything in print by an atheist on *contemporary* moral arguments for God's existence. It is even less common to find an atheist who discusses such arguments without denying moral realism or moral objectivism. Michael Martin's book is a welcome exception to this trend. Martin responds to moral arguments for God's existence *as a moral realist and as a moral objectivist*.
Martin does not just defend atheism against moral apologetics; he goes on the offensive, presenting an affirmative case for an atheistic moral realism. He also makes many interesting points about the idea that Christianity (and not just God in general) is the foundation of ethics, and offers a detailed discussion of the implications of Christianity and naturalism for the meaning of life.
The breadth of the territory covered by Martin is impressive; I know of no other book on the market that covers such a variety of metaethical issues from an atheistic perspective. Anyone interested in the relationship between naturalism, theism, and morality will find Martin's book useful. Moreover, unlike many books on metaethics, Martin's book is not highly technical, which helps to make it accessible to the lay reader.
However, the book does have its limitations. Many nonphilosophers will find Martin's presentation and defense of Ideal Observer Theory counterintuitive and unconvincing. Martin says nothing about the atheistic justification for adopting the moral point of view. And Martin says little or nothing about some of the influential moral arguments advanced by theists. For example, he says nothing about Robert Adams's work on the social nature of obligation and very little about George Mavrodes's argument about the "queerness of morality." In this sense, Martin's discussion is incomplete.
Nevertheless, despite these shortcomings, this book would make a useful addition to the library of anyone interested in the relationship between atheism and morality.
Rating: 5
Summary: A sustained case well argued
Comment: Martin undermines the Christian case for morality and meaning in life, and he also shows how an atheistic view can support an ethical theory and a meaningful life. Martin's sustained case for showing how life can have meaning without god, and how objective morality is possible without god, is must reading for both atheists and believers--especially the believers, since they often suffer from the mistaken stereotype that belief in god is a necessary condition for both ethics and meaning in life.
One may, perhaps, fault Martin for not devoting much space to alternative atheistic ethical theories other than the one he develops in the book, but details on those theories are readily available elsewhere, and Martin's book suffers from few other shortcomings. (Although, unfortunately, he does devote some space to refuting the absurd presuppositionalist claims of Bahnsen, a view that is not taken seriously in contemporary ethical theory anyway. But I guess someone has to refute it.)
This book should be on the shelf of anyone interested in the relationship between theism, morality, and meaning in life.
Readable, informative, accurate, and powerful. Buy it.
Rating: 2
Summary: Readable in style, but weak in content.
Comment: I find Martin's writing style very readable, especially when compared to some other philosophers. However, as with his other books, I find the arguments unoriginal and unconvincing. In this particular book, I find that he misrepresents many of the arguments used by his opponents (e.g. Bahnsen), and fails to overcome other arguments that he accurately represents.
I give him 3 stars for readability and 1 star for content, thus 2 stars for this book.
I would instead recommend books by Gordon Clark and Vincent Cheung. Search the web for "trinity foundation" and "vincent cheung", and I think you will find them. Cheung's books are free for download.
![]() |
Title: The Ghost in the Universe: God in Light of Modern Science by Taner Edis ISBN: 1573929778 Publisher: Prometheus Books Pub. Date: June, 2002 List Price(USD): $29.00 |
![]() |
Title: Science and Religion: Are They Compatible? by Paul Kurtz, Barry Karr, Ranjit Sandhu ISBN: 1591020646 Publisher: Prometheus Books Pub. Date: April, 2003 List Price(USD): $20.00 |
![]() |
Title: Has Science Found God? The Latest Results in the Search for Purpose in the Universe by Victor J. Stenger ISBN: 1591020182 Publisher: Prometheus Books Pub. Date: April, 2003 List Price(USD): $30.00 |
![]() |
Title: The Impossibility of God by Michael Martin, Ricki Monnier ISBN: 1591021200 Publisher: Prometheus Books Pub. Date: December, 2003 List Price(USD): $32.00 |
![]() |
Title: Ethics Without God by Kai Nielsen ISBN: 0879755520 Publisher: Prometheus Books Pub. Date: January, 1990 List Price(USD): $21.00 |
Thank you for visiting www.AnyBook4Less.com and enjoy your savings!
Copyright� 2001-2021 Send your comments