AnyBook4Less.com	Find the Best Price on the Web Order from a Major Online Bookstore
Home  |  Store List  |  FAQ  |  Contact Us  |
Ultimate Book Price Comparison Engine Save Your Time And Money Keyword AuthorISBN

Title: Betrayers by Phyllis Schlafly, Chester Ward ISBN: 0-934640-01-7 Publisher: Pere Marquette Pr Pub. Date: 01 June, 1968 Format: Paperback List Price(USD): $1.00

Your Country USA Canada United Kingdom Australia Austria Belgium France Germany Italy Netherlands Switzerland Currency AutoUSD CAD GBP EUR AUD CHF Delivery Only cheapest delivery All delivery options Include Used Books Are you a club member of: Barnes and Noble Books A Million Chapters.Indigo.ca

Average Customer Rating: 3.67 (3 reviews)

Rating: 5
Summary: Good book !
Comment: I read the review written by John M.K. with great amusement, as usual, leftists cannot argue facts so they attack the writer. Name calling and twisted logic is all they offer.

The book is well written.

Rating: 1
Summary: I give it 1 star for its study in crackpot extremism
Comment: Phylis Schlafly, associated with the extremist xenophobic John Birch Society, puts together a paranoid philonuclear diatribe here, that completely ignored the situation in the 1960s.

The idea that a ballistic missile defense is somehow useful is still sold as snake-oil by right-wing crackpots and defense contractors, but, back then, as now, it simply doesn't fly.

The recent "remarkable advances" in "missle defense" were only made by incorporating GPS transmitters into "targets!" Engineers- speaking honestly, without a financial stake in the outcome- have known this and spoken about this for decades. It's a big welfare program, plain and simple.

The idea of a "winnable" nuclear war is hideously immoral, and the Dr. Strangeloves and their consorts, such as Schlafly should be consigned to the ash-heap of history PRONTO.

Rating: 5
Summary: Astonishing
Comment: Whatever impression this book made at the time (1968), it is an astonishing read today. Written by Eagle Forum President and founder Phyllis Schlaffly and Admiral Chester Ward, the thesis of the book is that key members of the Johnson Administration, in particular Defense Secretary Robert McNamara, had actively sought to weaken and impair the defenses of the United States, motivated by a belief that the cause of freedom was doomed, that the Soviet Union would surely win the Cold War, and that preparing for the eventual inevitable surrender was the best means to survival.

Regardless of the validity of that position (or of the specific choice of motives), the information used to make the case bears examination. Schlaffly and Ward walk the reader through a panorama of Johnson Administration defense and foreign policy positions, compellingly outlining a defensive disaster. The astute reader will recall without reminder that in 1960, the United States possessed overwhelming military superiority over its Communist opponents, and that by 1968 -- just eight years, or two presidential terms, later -- that had turned into mere parity and, in some cases, inferiority. If nothing else, this caused extreme, needless problems for American diplomacy over the following two decades; and of course, it had the potential to cause far, far worse.

What Schlaffly and Ward show is that the cause of the change was not so much the Soviet build-up as McNamara's dismantling of America's existing force, including (but by no means limited to) the entirety of our B-47 fleet, much of our B-52 fleet, our entire fleet of supersonic (and brand new) B-58s, and our entire surface-to-air missile defense system in North America (a system, by the way, which centered on the Nike-Hercules missile, itself well capable of rudimentary ballistic missile defense). Moreover, in the face of the aforementioned radical Soviet build-up, McNamara cancelled all strategic submarine production, the B-70 program, and all modern ICBM development; and generally did everything in his power to decrease American power beneath that of its deadly enemy.

Combined with McNamara's non-strategy in Vietnam, one could almost believe the "Betrayers" thesis.

Perhaps most striking about this book, though, is not its amazing history but its astonishing currency. The Left's arguments against missile defense in particular have not changed in the slightest particular over the past three decades, despite revolutionary advances in technology and the complete upending of the "old world order". Pitifully enough, the arguments were as false then as now: the Nike-Hercules and Nike-X systems -- and even the pitiful Safeguard, deployed and then scrapped by Gerald Ford in 1975 -- were fine systems technologically; and a system of "defense" based on holding millions of people hostage to nuclear terror (otherwise known as "Mutual Assured Destruction") remains hideously immoral.

In any case, The Betrayers is one of the more interesting artifacts of the Cold War, and well worth picking up. No serious student of the period, or of current defense policy for that matter, should be without it.